T.O. 33B-1-14-9Figure 4-4. Relative Magnitude and Distribution of Eddy Currents in Good and Poor Conductors.4.2.2.1.2 Permeability.In a ferromagnetic material, as compared to a non-ferromagnetic material, the primary field results in a much greaterinternal field because of the large relative magnetic permeability. The increased field strength at the surface results inincreased eddy current density. The increased eddy current density generates a larger secondary field that rapidlyreduces the overall field strength a short distance from the surface. Consequently, the effective depth of penetrationduring eddy current inspection is much less in ferromagnetic materials than in other conductive materials. The highrelative magnetic permeability acts as a shield against the generation of eddy currents much below the surface in aferromagnetic part. Thus, eddy current testing of ferromagnetic parts is usually limited to testing for flaws or otherconditions that exist at or very near the surface of the part. The relative effects of permeability variations on the depthof penetration and the intensity of the eddy currents are shown in Figure 4-5.4.2.2.1.3 Geometry.Eddy currents, as generated by most eddy current inspection techniques, occupy a volume in a conductive material thatis relatively small. As indicated in Figure 4-4 and Figure 4-5, the volume is approximately conical and not very deep.The maximum diameter will be on the order of twice the diameter of the driving coil and the depth is estimated by theequation discussed in paragraph 4.2.3.3. Part geometry only becomes significant when this volume exceeds the volumeavailable within the part. This happens when the thickness of the region of the part inspected is less than the effectivedepth of this conical volume or when an area near edges of the part is inspected.
Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business
