T.O. 33B-1-16-506.6.5 NeutronRadiography.6.6.5.1 Description.Neutrons are useful for radiography because the attenuation of thermal neutrons is very different from that of X-rays.In general terms, the attenuation pattern is reversed in that many light materials (e.g., hydrogen, lithium, boron) havehigh attenuation of thermal neutrons while many heavy materials (e.g., bismuth, lead) are relatively transparent.Therefore, in this sense, neutron radiography can serve as a complementary inspection technique to X radiography.The advantages of thermal neutron radiography include excellent sensitivity to materials containing low atomic numberelements (particularly hydrogen, lithium, and boron), some additional high attenuation materials (examples includesilver, cadmium, indium, and gold), and rare earth elements (particularly samarium, gadolinium, and dysprosium).6.6.5.2 Applications.Sensitivity to low atomic number materials opens up neutron inspection to a variety of applications involving water,explosives, fluids, rubber, plastics, and corrosion products (usually a hydroxide). An example of this type of inspectionis neutron radiography of small explosive devices in metal cases to assure the presence of the explosive. Lead-coveredexplosive lines represent such an example. Inspection applications involving materials like cadmium have beendemonstrated in the nuclear industry for cadmium reactor control materials. Cadmium plating inspection can also beconsidered. A major application involving rare earth materials is the inspection of investment-cast turbine blades todetect residual ceramic core left in cooling passages after leaching.6.6.5.3 Disadvantages.Disadvantages of neutron radiography include the relatively high cost and additional radiation safety problems. Wherehigh volume applications exist, for example turbine blade inspection, cost need not be a prohibitive factor. Theadditional radiation safety issues arise mainly from the generation of radioactivity in the inspection sample. Theseproblems are rare and where they exist are usually easily handled by shielding and/or short waiting-time periods for theactivity in the sample to decay.SECTION VIIEFFECTIVE RADIOGRAPHIC INSPECTIONS.6.7 EFFECTIVERADIOGRAPHICINSPECTIONS.6.7.1 Introduction.This section describes the factors that determine whether or not a particular radiographic inspection is sufficientlysensitive to detect small defects. Sensitive radiography requires maximum subject contrast resulting from correctkilovoltage and alignment of the beam with the plane of the likely flaw; a sharp image due to good geometry andcontrol of secondary radiation; and optimum density to give good film contrast. Each of these factors is described inturn and, finally, a description is given of quantitative transformations to allow exposure and density changes with aminimum of experimentation.6.7.2 FactorsAffectingImageQuality.6.7.2.1 RadiationEnergy.The radiation energy chosen must be compatible with absorption of the subject. For low-absorbing subjects, low energyradiation produces final radiographic images with good contrast. Conversely, for inspection of thick, highly absorbingsubjects, the radiation must have sufficient penetrative capability to produce an image within a reasonable period oftime. For high contrast, 96 to 99 percent of the incident radiation should be absorbed by the subject. Increasingkilovoltage reduces contrast because the quantity of radiation at any given energy increases and, perhaps moreimportantly, the proportion of radiation with a short wavelength (high energy) increases disproportionately. Figure 6-21 shows these two relationships. High energy radiation can penetrate the subject more readily and thus reducessubject contrast. Figure 6-22 shows the effect on the final image of low or high contrast. The right diagram in Figure
Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business